Obscure justifications

for emergency use only — do not make copies

  • Sanssouci’s theorem
  • Hilfemich theorem
  • “Hurwitz’s theorem — well, since Hurwitz has several results, it’s sometimes credited to Hölder. Or Globus, maybe. Sometimes Glaucoma.”
  • “Stützlicher’s lemma — though it’s not widely known outside the Petrograd papers.”
  • General Use Criterion
  • Paulus-Tsaritsyn argumentation
  • the irreducible separatity of Kvetch partitions of the real plane
  • “Libre d’Eibon has it… but that’s an old result.”
  • Slurm’s lemma and high additivity
  • Lügner’s method
  • “a modified version of the reasoning in section 3″
  • Ph’nglui-fhtagn theorem (spoken use only)
  • the Subrizi-Butte-Sechs paper
  • “you can find the proof in a book by Springer, I think.”
  • Hudenwinker theorem
  • Geistbezug’s theorem

REMEMBER: NEVER MENTION ANYTHING OF THE RESULTS BEYOND WHAT IS SAID HERE! NEVER USE THE SAME RESULT TWICE! FIAT MATHEMATICIA RUAT CAELUM! ALL HAIL LEIBNIZ!

higher faculty use only — destroy after memorizing

2 Responses to “Obscure justifications”

  1. masksoferis Says:

    As a self-comment I hereby note that the word “hudenwinker” ( < hoodwinker) is apparently entirely new to the net, as Google had no results.

    This means that various references to H.’s works should be a safe escape in all fields of academia.

  2. Bob O'H Says:

    For the first couple of times, perhaps. After that we might start to think he’s as prolific as al, e.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers